Wind turbines keep getting bigger and less desirable to live around. So one designer rethought the whole thing.

What if wind power could be incorporated directly into buildings, in a way that actually made the buildings look better?

Wind power usually doesn’t as work well in cities, where surrounding buildings tend to block the breeze, but in certain cases--like buildings located directly on the coast--a new design from TU Delft architecture student Murtada Alkaabi might make a lot of sense.

The design uses panels on a moving facade to capture energy as the wind blows, creating a pattern inspired by waving grass that grows on beaches.

2014-04-23

Co.Exist

Here's A Wind Farm You'll Want To Live Inside

Wind power panels designed by Murtada Alkaabi can be incorporated into buildings, making them convenient for cities.

The typical wind turbine keeps getting bigger. One recent design is more than 700 feet tall and can power over 7,500 homes. The bigger the towers are, the less likely some people want them nearby (like in Cape Cod, where residents have been fighting offshore wind power for years because it affects the view). But what if wind power could be incorporated directly into buildings, in a way that actually made the buildings look better?

There are a couple of catches: It’s hard for smaller generators be as efficient as a giant tower, and wind power usually doesn’t as work well in cities, where surrounding buildings tend to block the breeze. But in certain cases—like buildings located directly on the coast—a new design from TU Delft architecture student Murtada Alkaabi might make a lot of sense.

The design uses panels on a moving facade to capture energy as the wind blows, creating a pattern inspired by waving grass that grows on beaches. It’s not the first concept to consider ways to integrate wind power in buildings. But Alkaabi says most other ideas don’t really focus on aesthetics.

"In recent years, we’ve seen some small conceptual developments by different research centers and universities, but unfortunately the focus stays mainly on the engineering aspect of the design," he explains. "At the same time, there's little interest in wind energy because of the remote location of wind farms and the reputation that they are unsuitable for habitation and recreation. This proposal tries to bring design and engineering to a greater audience, in a seamless way."

In Alkaabi’s design, the panels would be added to a modular building that can be configured in different shapes and used as housing or event space. To make reconfiguration easier, the facade is removable. The design includes other sustainable features, like a green roof that collects rainwater and circulates it through the plumbing in the building. But the wind-generating panels are the main feature.

"Architecture should not only focus on designing buildings, but also focus on combining sustainable energy and habitability," Alkaabi says. "This is exactly what this project aims to achieve—to let people experience the benefits of wind energy in a sustainable living environment, by combining architecture and a new wind energy system. The concept has the potential to become a tourist attraction and an architectural landmark."

The power the facade generates would go back in the grid, helping the building dramatically cut electricity bills. As Alkaabi worked on the design, he calculated how it would compare with an existing Belgian windfarm that covers around three square miles and uses 11 wind turbines. To generate the same amount of power, the new design would use a much smaller footprint.

"If we want to produce seven megawatts of energy, we only need to use 1.3 square miles of surface area," he explains. "That's less than half what's needed for 11 big, expensive, and ugly wind turbines."

Add New Comment

4 Comments

  • Predicating your technology on unfairly criticising an existing technology is basically a recipe for failure.

    I work in the wind energy industry in Australia, and the idea that 'wind farms are ugly' doesn't really have any sway when you actually go to the communities around wind farms.

    A good wind farm gives back to the community, and carefully minimises aesthetic impact. That's why you can build large, tall towers with rotating blades, that can capture significant quantities of energy.

    If Alkaabi wants to spruik his concept, he'll have to support his arguments with strong evidence, rather than subjective and imagined inherently weak claims.

  • architectureiloveit

    Hi ketan,

    I actually agree with what Alkaabi says, I think you misunderstand what he is aiming to. You can't deny that there are as well many people how dislike wind turbines, because the think they ruin nature and are bad for nature. On the other hand you also can't deny that these huge turbines are very expensive and take a lot of square meters. What Alkaabi actually want to say is that we stuck with what we have. We have seen that the technology is growing with day, so why not use this amazing technology to look out of the box and look for maybe a better or cheaper system.

    Second you are saying there are tall buildings with rotating blades that can capture significant quantities of energy, can you give me such examples. If you are talking about the Bahrain WTC Wind Turbines and Strata Tower, we say that there are many articles published about the malfunctioning of these turbines.

    Finally I think Alkaabi's concept is a good beginning to think out of the box.

  • I'd like to dovetail on Mike Barnard's comment. I don't find wind turbines to be ugly, at all--rather magnificent and majestic. Coal-fired power plants, spewing waste gas and particulates from smokestacks, now that's ugly.

  • Mike Barnard

    Ugly? Tons of people, the large majority according to every poll, find wind turbines beautiful. And innumerable people live in and among wind farms without complaints, and with strong appreciation for them. Check out these videos from people living with big wind generation. http://barnardonwind.com/2013/12/09/in-their-own-words-people-living-among-and-near-wind-farms-on-video/

    As for UDelft and alternatives to actually useful wind generation, they seem to keep accruing grants for people to do tiny side bet projects that get inordinate press and never go anywhere. http://barnardonwind.com/2013/12/30/ewicon-a-wet-behind-the-ears-wind-innovation/ http://www.gizmag.com/deft-kite-power-africa/28230/

    Meanwhile, UDelft is engaged in the real research and development consortium which is overcoming the engineering challenges with 20 MW wind turbines and gets a lot less press for that. That's a story worth publishing. http://www.innwind.eu