2012-09-04

Co.Exist

What The Drought Of 2012 Tells Us About Industrial Agriculture

The summer’s extreme weather is starting to expose cracks in the system.

I grew up on farms in Iowa and Wisconsin, surrounded by a family of farmers and agricultural workers, all of whom grew corn. I have never heard any farmer say, "Wow, we got the perfect amount of rain this year." It’s never perfect, and farming is a tough business. There have been droughts before, and it looks like there will certainly be more droughts in the future. However, the summer of 2012 has been historic in several ways:

● July was the all-time warmest month on record in the United States.
● Corn yields are predicted to be the lowest in 17 years.
● Corn futures touched a record high of $8.49 a bushel on August 10.
● July saw a 17-cent jump in the national average gasoline price—the biggest increase for that month on record.
● The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization reported the largest monthly jump in its cereal price index, up 38 points (17%) from June and only 14 points below its all-time high registered in April 2008.

So what’s the difference between 2012 and other years of drought?

For one, this summer has seen record-breaking heat and dryness, especially in America’s breadbasket. The drought came at a particularly bad moment in the corn growing cycle, resulting in a crop that is likely to be diminished by around 23% this year. This decrease in supply of course increases demand, increasing the price of corn, which gets passed along to industries that use corn (mainly ethanol producers and livestock and dairy farmers). Along with retailers, affected farmers and manufacturers absorb as much of the price as possible before they must pass the cost along to consumers in an already struggling economy. (See projected prices in the graphic.)

A second major difference is the amount of corn we grow for ethanol these days. There is a huge debate over the current ethanol mandate that I aim (rather optimistically) to steer clear of in this post. But when a drought knocks out 23% of the harvest, that deficit has to come from somewhere. The current federal renewable-fuel standards require 13.2 billion gallons of corn ethanol to be blended with gasoline this year. That takes 4.7 billion bushels of corn. In a year where 10.7 billion bushels is an optimistic estimate for the total national corn crop, that means nearly 44% of this year’s corn harvest would have to go toward ethanol.

Ethanol producers and grain farmers have to make a living and so do livestock and dairy farmers. The people and businesses on both sides of that equation are important to our country and our economy. Unfortunately, ethanol and grain now are competing with livestock and dairy farmers for the same reduced quantities of this year’s corn crop. The difference is that ethanol and grain farmers have a federal mandate on their side.

Historic droughts have a way of exposing weaknesses in our agricultural system. In this case, it’s the tie between food and fuel. Put simply, we take nearly half of our corn crop and use it to produce 10% of our gasoline supply. This is a huge shift. As you can see in the graph, in 1989, 4% of domestically used corn went to ethanol, and 93% went to livestock feed, corn seed, and food products. By 2011, about 45% of the crop went to ethanol, with 55% going to feed, seed, and food.

The government may relax federal renewable-fuel standards in light of the drought and they may not. A number of farmers are already culling their herds because they can’t afford to feed them. This results in more meat on the market in the short term, but higher prices for the consumer in the long term, and fewer small family farms.

Ethanol isn’t getting out of 2012 unscathed either. The high price of corn affects ethanol producers, and therefore the price of gasoline. Ethanol makes up 10% of gasoline in the U.S., on average, and is one of the factors that contributed to July’s record gasoline price increase. That is not to demonize ethanol—the U.S. grows more corn than any other country, so making some ethanol with corn helps us be less dependent on volatile foreign oil. But at what point do we become too dependent on one type of ethanol? When we start turning nearly half of our corn harvest into fuel, we don’t leave much margin for drought and other factors. Agriculture must be flexible and able to change quickly, like the weather.

It seems that diversification may be the key here. After all, consumers can arguably avoid high food prices in the short term by changing their eating habits, but that doesn’t help farmers. Farmers can pasture or feed their animals, but both of those options are compromised by the drought. Corn-based ethanol is currently the only biofuel we mix with gasoline in the U.S., but it doesn’t have to be in the future. Possible alternatives to corn-based ethanol—like advanced biofuels that run on drought-resistant switchgrass, agricultural waste, and manure—are on the horizon, but aren’t yet viable on a wide scale. Electric and natural gas cars are on the market today, but they are not yet commonplace.

As individuals, it’s easy to feel helpless, but we can always work to impact the market by decreasing our consumption of oil and gasoline using simple efficiency techniques like eco-driving, taking public transportation, and biking. Simple conservation methods like composting, planning meals, and eating leftovers make a difference in reducing food waste and saving money on food. Support farmers by buying their products. If you love cheese, keep eating cheese, even though it may be a bit more expensive next year. Save money by reducing the food you waste instead. Get to know your local farmers, buy local, and join a CSA. These small changes may sound basic, but every great movement has had a simple and straightforward message. Americans are great innovators and problem solvers, not to mention great farmers. The drought of 2012 is an important wake-up call. It has highlighted for us our dependency on an industrial agriculture system that may not be flexible and nimble enough for the changes we face in the future.

Add New Comment

6 Comments

  • Tuci78

    While all the "constrain and conserve" suggestions are laudable (and with real unemployment rates far above those officially promulgated by the federal Department of Labor, vast numbers of Americans are literally tightening their belts under the hammer-blows of adverse government measures with purposeful and deliberate malevolence calculated to raise the costs of food, energy, and transportation for every consumer), the real solution to our present and anticipated problems is to terminate the ethanol mandate with extreme prejudice.

    STOP BURNING FOOD in a wrong-headed politically correct, economically nonviable, and technologically unworkable effort to give the illusion of "renewable energy" to the address of what is increasingly proven to be a non-problem.

    The availability of petrochemical fuels is far greater than "peak oil" doomsayers have been whining, chiefly through the exploitation of extraction and other technologies (particularly dirigible deep-rock drilling, fractional perforation, and hydraulic fracturing of oil- and methane-bearing strata) developed more than half a century ago.

    We simply don't need to turn corn into fuel ethanol. We never did.  We never will. 

  • farmer200

    "July was the all-time warmest month on record in the United States."
    so when it was cooler in the 1930's  the drought  was worse.

    over the last 2000 years the US has had 100- 150 year droughts. Every 750 years in the US there is a mega drought we are due for another, this time it will be blamed on AGW.

  • Tuci78

     "... this time it will be blamed on AGW."

    Careful!  Heretical opposition to the dioxycarbophobic "climate consensus" on AGW ("man-made global climate change") will get you decried as a denier.

    "Just as intelligent design is a threshold question between nonscience and conjectures, anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is a threshold question between conjectures and hypotheses. AGW is a centuries-old conjecture elevated to an established belief by a little clique of quacks who proclaim themselves the Consensus on Climate, guardians of the vault of exclusive knowledge. Does this sound familiar? Is the Consensus patterned after the Council of Trent? As a matter of science, as opposed to a matter of belief, the AGW conjecture is gathering more contradictory evidence than supporting."

    [Jeff Glassman, "Conjecture, Hypothesis, Theory, Law - The Basis of Rational Argument," December 2007]

  • AnalStatCheck

    Quick statistics lesson - 1.53 inches is 60% more than 0.96 inches...but the chart incorrectly states 0.96 inches is 60% less than 1.53 inches.

  • ReadingComprehensionCheck

    I would ask you to look again
    AnalStatCheck. The chart states that rainfall as of July 23, 2012 is 60%
    less than a normal year. Normal year = 1.53 2012 = .96. The statistics are correct in the chart.

  • Ss11mans

    Droughts have been known to have a domino affect ballooning the economy. The true test of supply and demand, when supplies are low forces the hand to increase prices to keep jobs and to stay in operation, for when business gains ground you must have the forces to supply the demand.