A giant tumor on the side of the shrimp.

Looking under the tumor.

A broken carapace.

A blackened crack in the shell.

Black stains on the shrimp.

More black stains.

Blackened gills.

Blackened gills.

Would you like some shrimp? Delicious!

Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new FastCompany.com?

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.



Deformed Gulf Seafood Is Part Of The Deepwater Horizon Legacy

Two years later, the effects of the oil spill are still revealing themselves, this time in the form of deformed and eyeless shrimp. Take a look, if you dare.

It’s been two years since the Deepwater Horizon spill, and after a few months of wall-to-wall coverage, you haven’t heard so much from the Gulf lately. Things must be totally fine down there, we are left to think, after all the money BP has spent cleaning up the millions of gallons of oil. Sadly, that is not the case. While the oil might be mostly on the surface, a lot of it may have settled on the ocean floor, where it’s releasing chemicals into the water, and into our seafood.

As the two-year anniversary of the disaster nears, new reports are finding that all that oil—and the dispersant used to clean it up—might have been more harmful to the wildlife in the region than the public was initially led to believe. Besides an epidemic of fish infected with large lesions, shrimp have been hit especially hard. Because two or three shrimp generations have passed since the spill, the results are being felt across the population. A recent report by Al Jazeera found that shrimp were being hauled up from the Gulf with major deformities, like holes in their shells or giant tumors. There are even shrimp so mutated that they simply don’t have eyes.

And these shrimp aren’t just being put out of their misery and thrown back—they’re starting to come ashore to our tables. These photos, taken by Mac MacKenzie and publicized by the organization Bridge the Gulf, are of shrimp she found at her local grocery store. You can see large tumors, cracked shells with black rings (from microbes getting inside), and blackened gills.

Are these deformities from the spill? BP won’t comment on any particular Gulf seafood deformities, but has released a statement saying: "Seafood from the Gulf of Mexico is among the most tested in the world, and, according to the FDA and NOAA, it is as safe now as it was before the accident." Maybe they’re testing the wrong shrimp.

Add New Comment


  • Luke

    Ironic typo above. Dissapointing. Should be dissapointed. So dissapointed in my proofreading abilities.

  • Luke

    Very interesting issue. Love to know more about it. Have to say though. I'm a little disappointing. This article smacks of irresponsible reporting. The headline states "Deformed Gulf Seafood Is Part Of The Deepwater Horizon Legacy". But when you get to the end of the article, you realize it's pure speculation with almost no investigative reporting involved.

    I hate this kind of thing. Very disappointing. So now those clean up methods get a bad rap because some article suggests it might be at fault. That's lame.

    I wish this article started out as a question: "Is Deformed Gulf Seafood Part Of The Deepwater..."

    And I wish the facts (which are evidently anything but) were more responsibly handled. Ex. "Though there's no evidence to prove the oil and clean up methods are at fault, one has to wonder..."

    Look, maybe the oil spill is at fault. I'd like to know. But I'd like to know the truth. Or as close to it as we can scientifically get. But lets investigate, follow up, find out.

    This is shock journalism, the kind that uses an emotionally charged picture as argument and proof. Again, very disappointing. In a time when newspapers and investigative journalism are faltering, we're all looking for news reporters and curator/magazines we can trust. This is a let down, and drops my beloved Fast Company a tick or two in my mind.