Apple, Intel Have Stopped Using Conflict Minerals

Next year, U.S. electronics companies will be required by law to disclose and trace their use of conflict minerals (gold, tungsten, tantalum, and tin deposits that fund war in Central Africa). Instead of waiting to be attacked by human rights groups, Apple and Intel, and other companies involved in the Conflict-Free Smelter program opted to avoid embarrassment and ditch the minerals altogether—and the decision is causing some problems.

Conflict minerals are more in-demand than ever, with the need for copper alone expected to rise 7% each year in China through 2014. The Congo also provides 5% of the world's tin and up to 14% of all tantalum, an element used in high-tech manufacturing. As part of the Conflict-Free Smelter program, mineral processors are required to prove via a third-party assessment that their minerals don't fund conflicts in the Congo.

Now miners in the region are scrambling to find new, less scrupulous Asian buyers, according to Bloomberg. At the same time, traders are quickly trying to start programs that will track mineral origins before the U.S. conflict mineral disclosure law—called the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act—goes into effect. It's a tight timeline—the law was just announced last July. Now it's forcing members of the mineral industry to quickly make positive changes to their business practices.

[Image: Mark Craemer]

Read More: Microsoft Files Suit Against Nook E-Reader Makers Barnes & Noble, Foxconn Over Patent Infringement

Reach Ariel Schwartz via Twitter or email.

Add New Comment


  • Eric

    Apple has conducted audits of its smelters, but a lot of their money still goes towards armed groups in the Congo, whenever they buy Tin, Tungsten, Tantalum, gold, etc.. though I understand that they are making an effort to train smelters to identify conflict minerals (don't ask me how that works), to say that they've stopped buying any conflict minerals already is misleading.


  • Chutsu

    " to say that they've stopped buying any conflict minerals already is misleading." Am interested in your point, but where is your source? 

  • Murphy


    I'm a graphic designer. A very good one. I'm not trying to boast or brag, but unfortunately, in our field, the way to state your "worth" is to cite what you've done or periodicals you've been in such as HOW, PRINT, CA and so forth. Of which, or firm as been presented. I'll get to the point, I was searching images for a project we're doing for a client. A corporate responsibility and sustainability report and I came across your interesting site. I can't say that I fully understand what you are doing or how you are making your way in the world --- but I can say that I like it and if there is a way our my design firm can contribute -- let me know. We do work for the Rainforest Alliance and have (some) knowledge of the sustainability and responsibility sector. Don't misunderstand - we have clients that could give a flying fuck about that too, but it's a balance. A balance of karma, right an wrong and a little "robbing Peter to pay Paul" in that we take money from one client base to support our pro-bono activities for another cause. It's not optimal, but it helps me sleep at night. Check out our site (calibercreative.com) you'll see that we can at least put colors and type on a page and have it be pretty ---- beyond that -- let us know what you need. All the best -- pardon the rambling.
    my email is murphy .com